OnCo
cancersCancer

Osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common bone cancer, mostly in teenagers. Chemotherapy plus surgery cures about two-thirds when it has not spread, but survival has not improved in 30 years and no new drug has worked in a large trial.

Osteosarcoma is a high-grade bone sarcoma with chaotic genomes (TP53 and RB1 loss, chromothripsis, no recurrent targetable driver), arising in the metaphyses of long bones during growth spurts and in older adults after Paget disease or radiation. Germline predisposition (Li-Fraumeni, hereditary retinoblastoma, Rothmund-Thomson) accounts for a meaningful fraction.

Standard therapy since the 1980s is neoadjuvant MAP (high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin), limb-salvage surgery, and adjuvant MAP; histologic response (≥90% necrosis) is prognostic but intensifying therapy for poor responders (EURAMOS-1: adding ifosfamide-etoposide) did not help, nor did interferon maintenance. Mifamurtide (liposomal MTP-PE) is approved in the EU (INT-0133) but not in the US. Lung metastases are resected whenever possible. Relapsed disease has ~20% survival; multikinase inhibitors (regorafenib in SARC024/REGOBONE, cabozantinib in CABONE, sorafenib) give short PFS gains. Novel approaches: GD2- and HER2-directed CAR-T, B7-H3 ADCs, radiopharmaceuticals (Ra-223, Sm-153), and biology from canine osteosarcoma.

State of the art today

  • MAP chemotherapy, unchanged since the 1980s, remains the standard; EURAMOS-1 (2,260 patients) closed the door on intensification.
  • Limb salvage is possible in >90% with expandable prostheses for growing children.
  • Multikinase inhibitors are the only agents with randomised evidence at relapse, and the gain is months.
  • Immunotherapy has largely failed (checkpoint inhibitors inactive); cellular therapy against GD2/HER2/B7-H3 is the active frontier.
Who it affects
Show survival figures (1)

Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

  • The most common primary bone cancer; ~1,000 cases per year in the US with peaks in adolescence and over 60 (Paget disease, radiation); 5-year survival ~70% localised, ~25% metastatic.

Where the cases are

Cases by country · GLOBOCAN 2022
All countries →

No country-level case numbers. This cancer is not mapped to a GLOBOCAN site.

Standard of care

4top
Localised high-grade

Neoadjuvant MAP (methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin) ×2 cycles, limb-salvage resection with wide margins (amputation if required), adjuvant MAP to ~29 weeks; mifamurtide added in EU.

Metastatic at diagnosis

Same chemotherapy with resection of all metastases (thoracotomy) when feasible; survival ~25-30%.

NCCN · Category 2A
Relapsed

Surgical resection of recurrence; ifosfamide ± etoposide, gemcitabine-docetaxel; regorafenib or cabozantinib; clinical trials (CAR-T, ADCs).

NCCN · Category 2A
Unresectable / axial

Carbon-ion or proton radiotherapy for craniofacial and pelvic tumours; Sm-153 or Ra-223 for bone-forming metastases (investigational).

Subtypes & biomarkers

top
Subtypes
Biomarkers clinicians test

Target prevalence in this cancer

History

7top
  1. 1970Amputation alone cures <20%; lung metastases the rule
  2. 1972High-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue (Jaffe) and adriamycin (Cortes) show activity
  3. 1979Rosen's T-10: neoadjuvant chemotherapy and limb salvage
  4. 1986Randomised proof that adjuvant chemotherapy cures (Link, NEJM; MIOS)
  5. 2008INT-0133: mifamurtide improves overall survival; EU approval 2009
  6. 2016EURAMOS-1: no benefit from intensifying for poor responders or interferon for good responders
  7. 2019Regorafenib (SARC024, REGOBONE) and cabozantinib (CABONE) show activity at relapse

Pipeline

5top

Open problems

  • No survival improvement since the 1980s; metastatic and relapsed disease ~20-30% survival.
  • No recurrent druggable driver; genomic chaos.
  • Chemotherapy toxicity: cardiotoxicity, hearing loss, infertility, second cancers.
  • Rarity fragments trials; international cooperation (EURAMOS) needed for every question.

Trials

top

Recruiting now (live from ClinicalTrials.gov)

Recruiting trials near you · live from ClinicalTrials.gov
Osteosarcoma
condition: Osteosarcoma
Open on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Country and place are remembered in this browser only. A postcode is sent to OpenStreetMap's Nominatim service to find coordinates when you press the button; nothing else leaves your device.

Expert centres

top
Where the expertise is

Centres linked to this cancer in OnCo

Seeking a second opinion: ask your oncologist for a referral to a high-volume centre; most accept records and pathology by mail or telehealth. In the US, use the NCI's Find a Cancer Center tool or the nonprofit Cancer Commons, which navigates options for advanced cancers at no cost.

Questions to ask

top
Bring to your appointment

Questions to ask your oncologist about Osteosarcoma

Generated from this cancer's standard of care, biomarkers, and pipeline · 17 questions

Newly diagnosed

  1. What is my exact diagnosis, stage, and grade, and which tests established them?
    Why: Everything else follows from an accurate stage and subtype.
  2. Which biomarkers have been tested on my tumour (for example Histologic necrosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Alkaline phosphatase and LDH, Metastases at diagnosis, Germline TP53 / RB1 / RECQL4, GD2, HER2, B7-H3 expression), and what were the results?
    Why: These results decide eligibility for targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and trials.
  3. Which subtype is my cancer, and does that change the recommended treatment?
    Why: Recognised subtypes for this cancer include Conventional high-grade, Telangiectatic, Small cell.
  4. Is germline (inherited) genetic testing recommended for me or my family?
    Why: Inherited variants can change treatment and matter for relatives.

Localised high-grade

  1. For my situation (localised high-grade), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Neoadjuvant MAP (methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin) ×2 cycles, limb-salvage resection with wide margins (amputation if required), adjuvant MAP to ~29 weeks; mifamurtide added in EU.
  2. Am I a candidate for Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, Cisplatin or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Metastatic at diagnosis

  1. For my situation (metastatic at diagnosis), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Same chemotherapy with resection of all metastases (thoracotomy) when feasible; survival ~25-30%.
  2. Am I a candidate for Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, Cisplatin or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Relapsed

  1. For my situation (relapsed), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Surgical resection of recurrence; ifosfamide ± etoposide, gemcitabine-docetaxel; regorafenib or cabozantinib; clinical trials (CAR-T, ADCs).
  2. Am I a candidate for Ifosfamide, Etoposide, Regorafenib or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Unresectable / axial

  1. For my situation (unresectable / axial), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Carbon-ion or proton radiotherapy for craniofacial and pelvic tumours; Sm-153 or Ra-223 for bone-forming metastases (investigational).
  2. Am I a candidate for Radium-223 dichloride, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Any stage

  1. Are there clinical trials I could join, for example of Regorafenib, Cabozantinib, CAR-T cell therapy, Radium-223 dichloride?
    Why: Trials are how the next standard of care is set; asking early keeps options open.
  2. Would a second opinion at a high-volume centre change anything, and can you help arrange it?
    Why: Rare or high-stakes decisions benefit from a centre that treats many similar patients.
  3. What supportive care (symptom control, nutrition, exercise, mental health, financial help) is available from the start?
    Why: Supportive care improves quality of life and helps patients complete treatment.
  4. I read that “No survival improvement since the 1980s; metastatic and relapsed disease ~20-30% survival”. How does that affect my plan?
    Why: Open problems are where trials and second opinions matter most.
  5. I read that “No recurrent druggable driver; genomic chaos”. How does that affect my plan?
    Why: Open problems are where trials and second opinions matter most.

Print this page for your appointment (your browser's print command). These prompts are for discussion; your clinical team knows your case.

Everything relevant

53top

Direct links plus the targets, companies, and technologies of this cancer's products.

technologies

15

targets

9

drugs

11

companies

5

institutions

4

pathways

2

terms

3

collections

2

people

2

Latest papers

top
Latest papers · live from Europe PMC
Open in Europe PMC

Query for this cancer: (TITLE:"Osteosarcoma" OR ABSTRACT:"Osteosarcoma") AND (treatment OR therapy OR trial OR survival OR diagnosis). Results are unfiltered search hits about Osteosarcoma, not a curated reading list.

Connected

39top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links

technologies

7

targets

5

drugs

11

companies

3

institutions

4

pathways

2

terms

3

collections

2

people

2