OnCo

Review queue

0 of 3,377 reviewable pages carry a named review. The queue below ranks the rest by reach, stakes and staleness, so a reviewer with an hour knows where it counts most. Signing off is an issue form; a maintainer verifies identity and records the review.

Coverage

Pages reviewed
0 of 3,377 (0%)
Expert sign-offs
0
clinical, scientific and regulatory tracks
Patient-advocate sign-offs
0
TL;DRs, simple text and questions
KindPagesExpertAdvocateAny reviewTracks needed
Cancer64000 (0%)Expert (clinical), Patient advocate
Front19000 (0%)Patient advocate
Technology348000 (0%)Expert (scientific)
Target92000 (0%)Expert (scientific)
Product377000 (0%)Expert (regulatory), Expert (clinical), Patient advocate
Pathway80000 (0%)Expert (scientific)
Term600000 (0%)Patient advocate
Trial401000 (0%)Expert (clinical)
Pairing85000 (0%)Expert (scientific)
Roadmap13000 (0%)Expert (scientific)
Idea1,107000 (0%)Expert (scientific)
Bottleneck45000 (0%)Expert (scientific)
Key paper146000 (0%)Expert (scientific)

Companies, institutions, people, collections and journals are attributed (who wrote the record) rather than reviewed; organisations correct their own records through Suggest an edit.

The queue

Score out of 100: reach (graph connections, log-scaled, up to 40), stakes (evidence score or a kind default, up to 30), staleness (days since the record's asOf, a year is 30). Pages already reviewed on every track they need within a year sort to the bottom. Formula in src/lib/review-queue.ts.

#PageScoreLinksEvidenceAgeNeeds
170274n/a6 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
270308n/a6 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
37051n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
47052n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
57054996 dExpert (scientific)Review this page
67031n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
770175n/a6 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
870265n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
97041n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
1070282n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
1170226n/a6 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
127058n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
1370604n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
147047n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
1570314n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
1670192n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
177067n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
187079n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
1970334n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
207049n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
217043n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
2270263n/a4 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
237041n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
2470317n/a6 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
257034n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
2670291n/a6 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
2770296n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
2870175n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
2970619n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
3070317996 dExpert (scientific)Review this page
317048n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
327071n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
337063n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
34
CancerMelanoma
70422n/a6 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
357046n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
3670137n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
3770101996 dExpert (scientific)Review this page
3870285n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
397065n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
407060n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
417054n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
4270169n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
4370196n/a6 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
4470714n/a4 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
4570242n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
467070n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
4770320n/a3 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
4870379n/a4 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
497065n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page
507047n/a2 dExpert (clinical), Patient advocateReview this page

Showing the top 50 of 3,377 reviewable pages.

By track

The ten highest-need pages for each track, so a clinician, a scientist, a regulatory specialist or an advocate can start without reading the whole queue.

Translations

Every translated TL;DR is machine-assisted until a named speaker of the language reviews it. Pages show MT until then and Reviewed after. Reviews are recorded in src/data/i18n/reviewed.ts.

LanguageTranslated TL;DRsReviewedReviewers
Spanish Español4480 (0%)0Review translations
Chinese 中文4480 (0%)0Review translations
Portuguese Português4480 (0%)0Review translations
Hindi हिन्दी4480 (0%)0Review translations

Spotted a wrong translation on one page? Use Translation fix; to sign off a batch, Translation review.

How to review

  1. Pick a page from the queue and read it with its linked sources open.
  2. Click Review this page. The issue form carries the checklist for your track: expert (clinical), expert (scientific), expert (regulatory), patient advocate. Say what you checked and what you found wrong, with sources.
  3. State your name, role and organisation, a profile URL we can verify, and your conflicts of interest for the last three years. “None declared” is a valid answer and is displayed.
  4. A maintainer verifies identity, fixes anything you flagged (each fix is a sourced edit through the same gate), then records the sign-off in src/data/reviews.ts. The badge appears on the page with your name, the date and your COI statement, and you appear on the roster.

A review is a statement about a page on a date, not an endorsement. Nothing is edited directly by reviewers or by anyone else: every change enters as an issue and is checked before it is merged. Tracks and verification rules: REVIEWERS.md.