OnCo
cancersCancer

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (PV, ET, myelofibrosis)

aka MPN, Polycythaemia vera, Essential thrombocythaemia, Primary myelofibrosis

Slow-growing blood cancers in which the marrow makes too many red cells, platelets or scar tissue. Almost all carry a mutation in JAK2, CALR or MPL. Treatment aims at preventing clots, controlling symptoms and, in myelofibrosis, shrinking the spleen.

The classical BCR-ABL1-negative MPNs (polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia, primary myelofibrosis) are clonal diseases driven by JAK-STAT activation: JAK2 V617F in ~95% of PV and ~60% of ET/PMF, CALR in ~25% of ET/PMF, MPL in ~5%. Risk in PV/ET is thrombosis (managed with aspirin, phlebotomy, hydroxyurea or interferon); in myelofibrosis it is cytopenias, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms and leukaemic transformation (about 10-20%), risk-scored by DIPSS-plus, MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+ v2.0.

Ruxolitinib (COMFORT-I/II, 2011) was the first JAK inhibitor; fedratinib (2019), pacritinib (2022, for platelets <50) and momelotinib (2023, for anaemic patients) followed. None is disease-modifying: allogeneic transplant remains the only cure for myelofibrosis. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (2021) is the first approved interferon for PV with evidence of molecular response, and rusfertide (2026), a hepcidin mimetic, is the first drug to control PV erythrocytosis without phlebotomy (VERIFY). CALR-directed antibodies and JAK2 V617F-selective inhibitors are the disease-modifying hope; pelabresib (BET inhibitor) plus ruxolitinib improved spleen response but not symptoms in MANIFEST-2.

State of the art today

  • Four approved JAK inhibitors cover spleen, symptoms, thrombocytopenia and anaemia, but none reverses fibrosis or clears the clone.
  • Interferon is the only drug with consistent molecular responses in PV/ET, and ropeginterferon made it practical.
  • Rusfertide (2026) is the first mechanistically new PV drug in a decade and removes the need for phlebotomy in most patients.
  • The next wave targets the clone itself: mutant-CALR antibodies (e.g. INCA033989), JAK2 V617F-selective inhibitors, and navitoclax/pelabresib combinations with mixed phase 3 results.
Who it affects
Show survival figures (1)

Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

  • Combined incidence around 2-3 per 100,000 per year; PV and ET are chronic diseases lived with for decades, myelofibrosis has a median survival of about six years.

Where the cases are

Cases by country · GLOBOCAN 2022
All countries →

No country-level case numbers. This cancer is not mapped to a GLOBOCAN site.

Standard of care

4top
PV

Low-dose aspirin, phlebotomy to haematocrit <45%; cytoreduction (hydroxyurea or ropeginterferon alfa-2b) for high-risk; ruxolitinib after hydroxyurea failure (RESPONSE); rusfertide to eliminate phlebotomy need (VERIFY, 2026).

ET

Risk-adapted (IPSET-thrombosis): observation or aspirin in low risk; hydroxyurea or interferon in high risk; anagrelide second line.

NCCN Guidelines: MPN
Myelofibrosis, intermediate-2/high risk

JAK inhibitor for spleen and symptoms: ruxolitinib (COMFORT), fedratinib, pacritinib if platelets <50×10⁹/L, momelotinib if anaemic (MOMENTUM); allogeneic HSCT for eligible patients (the only cure).

NCCN · Category 1 (ruxolitinib, fedratinib); 2A (p…
Anaemia of myelofibrosis

Momelotinib, luspatercept (INDEPENDENCE), ESA, danazol, transfusion.

Subtypes & biomarkers

top
Subtypes
  • Polycythaemia vera (PV)
  • Essential thrombocythaemia (ET)
  • Prefibrotic and overt primary myelofibrosis (PMF)
  • Post-PV / post-ET myelofibrosis
  • MPN in blast phase
  • Triple-negative MPN
Biomarkers clinicians test

Target prevalence in this cancer

Target / alterationPrevalenceSource
JAK2
60-95%
doi.org

How common each drug target or alteration is in this cancer. Population-level and approximate; see the target page for detail. Full matrix.

History

10top
  1. 1951Dameshek groups the MPNs

    Proposes that PV, ET, CML and myelofibrosis are related myeloproliferative disorders.

  2. 2005JAK2 V617F discovered

    Four groups report the mutation in most PV and half of ET/PMF; the first molecular marker for BCR-ABL1-negative MPN.

  3. 2011Ruxolitinib approved

    COMFORT-I/II: spleen and symptom benefit in myelofibrosis; the first JAK inhibitor.

  4. 2013CALR mutations

    Klampfl and Nangalia find CALR exon 9 mutations in most JAK2-negative ET/PMF.

  5. 2013Haematocrit target proven

    CYTO-PV: keeping haematocrit <45% cuts cardiovascular death and major thrombosis in PV.

  6. 2019Fedratinib approved

    JAKARTA; the second JAK inhibitor after an eight-year gap.

  7. 2021Ropeginterferon alfa-2b approved for PV

    PROUD/CONTINUATION-PV: superior long-term haematologic and molecular response versus hydroxyurea.

  8. 2022Pacritinib for severe thrombocytopenia
  9. 2023Momelotinib for anaemic myelofibrosis

    MOMENTUM: symptom, spleen and transfusion-independence benefit versus danazol.

  10. 2026Rusfertide approved for PV

    VERIFY: hepcidin mimetic controls erythrocytosis without phlebotomy; FDA approval August 2026.

Pipeline

4top

Open problems

  • No disease-modifying therapy in myelofibrosis short of transplant.
  • MPN in blast phase: outcomes as poor as secondary AML.
  • Whether interferon-induced molecular response prevents progression.
  • Sequencing and combining JAK inhibitors with BET, BCL-XL or CALR-directed agents.

Trials

top

Recruiting now (live from ClinicalTrials.gov)

Recruiting trials near you · live from ClinicalTrials.gov
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (PV, ET, myelofibrosis)
condition: Myeloproliferative neoplasms
Open on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Country and place are remembered in this browser only. A postcode is sent to OpenStreetMap's Nominatim service to find coordinates when you press the button; nothing else leaves your device.

Expert centres

top
Where the expertise is

Centres linked to this cancer in OnCo

Seeking a second opinion: ask your oncologist for a referral to a high-volume centre; most accept records and pathology by mail or telehealth. In the US, use the NCI's Find a Cancer Center tool or the nonprofit Cancer Commons, which navigates options for advanced cancers at no cost.

Questions to ask

top
Bring to your appointment

Questions to ask your oncologist about Myeloproliferative neoplasms

Generated from this cancer's standard of care, biomarkers, and pipeline · 17 questions

Newly diagnosed

  1. What is my exact diagnosis, stage, and grade, and which tests established them?
    Why: Everything else follows from an accurate stage and subtype.
  2. Which biomarkers have been tested on my tumour (for example JAK2 V617F and exon 12, CALR type 1/2, MPL W515, High-molecular-risk mutations, DIPSS-plus / MIPSS70+ v2.0), and what were the results?
    Why: These results decide eligibility for targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and trials.
  3. Which subtype is my cancer, and does that change the recommended treatment?
    Why: Recognised subtypes for this cancer include Polycythaemia vera, Essential thrombocythaemia, Prefibrotic and overt primary myelofibrosis.
  4. Is germline (inherited) genetic testing recommended for me or my family?
    Why: Inherited variants can change treatment and matter for relatives.

PV

  1. For my situation (pv), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Low-dose aspirin, phlebotomy to haematocrit <45%; cytoreduction (hydroxyurea or ropeginterferon alfa-2b) for high-risk; ruxolitinib after hydroxyurea failure (RESPONSE); rusfertide to eliminate phlebotomy need (VERIFY, 2026).
  2. Am I a candidate for Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide), Ropeginterferon alfa-2b, Ruxolitinib or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

ET

  1. For my situation (et), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Risk-adapted (IPSET-thrombosis): observation or aspirin in low risk; hydroxyurea or interferon in high risk; anagrelide second line.
  2. Am I a candidate for Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide), Ropeginterferon alfa-2b, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Myelofibrosis, intermediate-2/high risk

  1. For my situation (myelofibrosis, intermediate-2/high risk), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: JAK inhibitor for spleen and symptoms: ruxolitinib (COMFORT), fedratinib, pacritinib if platelets <50×10⁹/L, momelotinib if anaemic (MOMENTUM); allogeneic HSCT for eligible patients (the only cure).
  2. Am I a candidate for Ruxolitinib, Fedratinib, Pacritinib or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Anaemia of myelofibrosis

  1. For my situation (anaemia of myelofibrosis), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Momelotinib, luspatercept (INDEPENDENCE), ESA, danazol, transfusion.
  2. Am I a candidate for Momelotinib, Luspatercept, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Any stage

  1. Are there clinical trials I could join, for example of Rusfertide, Momelotinib, Luspatercept, Allogeneic stem cell transplantation?
    Why: Trials are how the next standard of care is set; asking early keeps options open.
  2. Would a second opinion at a high-volume centre change anything, and can you help arrange it?
    Why: Rare or high-stakes decisions benefit from a centre that treats many similar patients.
  3. What supportive care (symptom control, nutrition, exercise, mental health, financial help) is available from the start?
    Why: Supportive care improves quality of life and helps patients complete treatment.
  4. I read that “No disease-modifying therapy in myelofibrosis short of transplant”. How does that affect my plan?
    Why: Open problems are where trials and second opinions matter most.
  5. I read that “MPN in blast phase: outcomes as poor as secondary AML”. How does that affect my plan?
    Why: Open problems are where trials and second opinions matter most.

Print this page for your appointment (your browser's print command). These prompts are for discussion; your clinical team knows your case.

Everything relevant

32top

Direct links plus the targets, companies, and technologies of this cancer's products.

technologies

8

targets

4

drugs

9

companies

5

institutions

1

pathways

1

terms

1

collections

1

key papers

2

Key papers

2top

Latest papers

top
Latest papers · live from Europe PMC
Open in Europe PMC

Query for this cancer: (TITLE:"Myeloproliferative neoplasms" OR ABSTRACT:"Myeloproliferative neoplasms" OR TITLE:"PV, ET, myelofibrosis" OR ABSTRACT:"PV, ET, myelofibrosis" OR TITLE:"MPN" OR ABSTRACT:"MPN" OR TITLE:"Polycythaemia vera" OR ABSTRACT:"Polycythaemia vera" OR TITLE:"Essential thrombocythaemia" OR ABSTRACT:"Essential thrombocythaemia" OR TITLE:"Primary myelofibrosis" OR ABSTRACT:"Primary myelofibrosis") AND (treatment OR therapy OR trial OR survival OR diagnosis). Results are unfiltered search hits about Myeloproliferative neoplasms (PV, ET, myelofibrosis), not a curated reading list.

Connected

27top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links