Cold tumours and the immunosuppressive microenvironment
Most tumours keep the immune system out or asleep, so immunotherapy helps only a minority.
Checkpoint blockade is the most important therapeutic advance of the last two decades, yet it works durably in a minority of patients and barely at all in several of the biggest killers. Pancreatic, prostate, most breast and microsatellite-stable colorectal cancers and glioblastoma are 'cold': few infiltrating T cells, low neoantigen load, dense desmoplastic stroma, abundant myeloid suppressor cells and regulatory T cells, hypoxia, and metabolic competition that starves effector cells. Even in 'hot' tumours, exhaustion and antigen loss limit durability. The field has many candidate mechanisms and many single-agent attempts (IDO, TIGIT, STING agonists, oncolytic viruses, CD47) that have failed in phase 3 because the biology of each tumour's exclusion is different and largely unmeasured. Converting cold tumours, or bypassing the microenvironment with engineered cells, bispecifics and radioligands, is the central strategic problem in immuno-oncology.
- Low mutational burden yields few neoantigens for T cells to recognise.
- Desmoplastic stroma and abnormal vasculature physically exclude lymphocytes.
- Myeloid-derived suppressor cells, tumour-associated macrophages and regulatory T cells actively switch off effector cells.
- Hypoxia, lactate, adenosine and nutrient depletion in the tumour disable T-cell metabolism.
- Loss of MHC class I and antigen-presentation machinery makes tumours invisible even when T cells are present.
- Combination trials have mostly added agents empirically without a biomarker for the specific exclusion mechanism.
- T-cell engagers and CAR-T bypass the need for endogenous priming; tarlatamab (DLL3) and mesothelin or GD2 CAR-T show that engineered T cells can act in solid tumours.
- STING agonists, oncolytic viruses (RP1, T-VEC) and photoimmunotherapy are being tested as in situ vaccines to turn cold lesions hot.
- FAP-targeted radioligands and FAP theranostics attack the fibroblast stroma directly.
- Neoantigen mRNA vaccines (Moderna/Merck intismeran, BioNTech autogene cevumeran) aim to generate T-cell responses where none exist, including in pancreatic cancer.
- Trials in MSS colorectal cancer combine checkpoint blockade with VEGF, MEK or bispecific agents, and NICHE-2 showed dramatic neoadjuvant responses in dMMR disease.
- Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex imaging (10x Genomics, Human Cell Atlas) are being used to classify exclusion mechanisms per tumour.
A powerful immune-suppressing signal called TGF-beta keeps immune cells out of tumours, but blocking it throughout the body causes heart and skin problems. Tethering the blocker inside the tumour could give benefit without the harm.
Drugs that grab T cells and drag them onto tumours work well in blood cancers. The same trick aimed at tumour-eating cells might work where T cells are absent.
An old part of the immune system called complement can be hijacked by tumours to summon protective cells. Drugs that block it already exist for other diseases.
Cancer cells can survive a drug because surrounding normal cells feed them growth signals. Blocking those signals could make existing drugs work better and longer.
Pancreatic tumours are packed with a type of white blood cell that shuts down the immune attack. Blocking the signal that recruits them may open the tumour to immunotherapy.
Tumours are acidic, and immune cells stop working in acid. Neutralising that acid, or blocking the pumps that create it, might let immunotherapy work.
Some cancer proteins sit on the cell surface or float outside cells, where protein-destroying drugs cannot reach. A different trick can drag them inside to be broken down.
Some harmless bacteria naturally grow in the low-oxygen core of tumours. Engineering them to produce immune-activating drugs turns them into tiny factories inside the tumour.
For people at very high cancer risk, install a small population of engineered immune cells that live for years and destroy cells showing early cancer signals before a tumour forms.
Tumours that contain small immune structures resembling lymph nodes respond far better to immunotherapy. Inducing those structures on purpose could make cold tumours responsive.
A rice-grain-sized implant can release small doses of many different drugs into separate spots of a tumour, then be removed so doctors can see which one worked in that person.
Breathing in an immune-activating drug could turn the lungs into bad soil for cancer seeds, at doses far too low to cause body-wide side-effects.
A cheap blood pressure drug may soften the dense scar tissue around pancreatic tumours so chemotherapy and immune cells can get in. Early trials look encouraging.
Immunotherapy works in tumours that immune cells can enter and ignores those that shut them out. Systematically test ways to open up the shut-out tumours, measured with spatial maps.
The support cells that build a tumour's scaffolding come in several types: some protect the tumour, others restrain it. Treating all of them the same way explains past failures.
Focused ultrasound can break a tumour apart without heat or cuts, leaving debris the immune system can learn from. Doing that to one tumour may help treat the rest.
Interleukin-12 is one of the most powerful immune stimulants but is too toxic to inject into the bloodstream. A virus can be engineered to make it only inside a tumour.
Radiation can alert the immune system, but too big a single dose destroys the very alarm signal it creates. Picking the right dose and schedule may be free extra benefit.
Tumours fill with immune cells that protect them. Earlier drugs tried to remove those cells and failed. Newer ones aim to switch them to the attacking side.
The liver is where bowel cancer most often spreads. Drugs delivered straight into the liver's blood supply could retrain its resident immune cells to reject arriving cancer cells.
Transferring gut bacteria from patients who responded to immunotherapy has helped some patients who had stopped responding. It is time for a proper large trial.
People who eat more fibre appear to respond better to immunotherapy, while some probiotic supplements may do the opposite. A proper trial would settle it.
Muscle is an immune organ as well as a movement organ. Building it during immunotherapy might improve how well the treatment works, not just how patients feel.
Certain vaccines and fungal sugars reprogramme the bone marrow so it produces more aggressive immune cells for months. That could be used before immunotherapy.
Intracavitary immunotherapy targets cancer that coats the lining of the abdomen or chest, which drugs given by drip barely reach. Delivering it straight into the cavity gives far higher local doses.
The first lymph node cancer reaches is also where the immune system learns to fight it. Injecting immunotherapy into that node before surgery, instead of removing it blindly, may work better.
Injecting immune-activating agents into a single tumour, plus a small dose of radiation, can teach the immune system to attack tumours elsewhere in the body.
Low doses of drugs that change how DNA is packaged can make cancer cells display more of what marks them as abnormal, potentially waking up immunotherapy in cold tumours.
Tumours starved of oxygen produce a chemical that switches immune cells off. A scan can show which tumours are starved, and those are the ones to treat with blockers.
Low doses of anti-blood-vessel drugs briefly make tumour vessels work better, which helps immune cells and other drugs get in. Scans can find that window for each patient.
For fit patients with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic cancer, a FOLFIRINOX-type regimen is now proven to be better than gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, settling a long-standing debate. The absolute gain is about two months of median survival, and the regimen is more toxic for the gut. Whether liposomal irinotecan adds anything over conventional irinotecan (standard FOLFIRINOX) has never been tested head-to-head.
Pancreatic cancer was thought to be immunologically inert because of its low mutation burden; this study showed that with the right vaccine platform its few neoantigens can still be targeted. It is the strongest human evidence so far that personalised cancer vaccines can generate durable, tumour-specific immunity, and it justifies the randomised trials now running in pancreatic cancer and melanoma. Benefit is not yet proven, because responders may simply have had more immunogenic tumours.
Pages like this
not linked directly; found by shared links- BottleneckNo one can predict who responds to immunotherapy
Shares KEYNOTE-177, Clear the suppressive neutrophils out of pancreatic tumours first, De-acidify the tumour so T cells can work in it, Test protein and resistance training during immunotherapy.
- PathwayThe cancer-immunity cycle
Shares Immunogenic cell death, STING & innate immune agonists, Intismeran autogene, cGAS–STING innate sensing.
- PathwayTumour microenvironment (TME)
Shares CD47, Nutrient competition & metabolic immunosuppression, cGAS–STING innate sensing, Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).
- PathwayT-cell exhaustion
Shares TIGIT, Tiragolumab, LAG-3, Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).
- CancerMelanoma
Shares Replimune, ADU-S100 (MIW815), De-acidify the tumour so T cells can work in it, Test protein and resistance training during immunotherapy.
- PairingPersonalised neoantigen vaccine + PD-1 blockade
Shares INTerpath-001 (V940-001), Autogene cevumeran, Rojas 2023: a personalised mRNA vaccine trained T cells against each patient's pancreatic cancer, and those who responded stayed cancer-free longer, Intismeran autogene.
- IdeaPersonalised vaccines given only when the blood test turns positive
Shares BioNTech, Autogene cevumeran, Moderna, Intismeran autogene.
- Key paperLe 2017: mismatch-repair deficiency predicts response to PD-1 blockade across twelve tumour types, leading to the first tissue-agnostic drug approval
Shares KEYNOTE-177, CheckMate 8HW, Tumour mutational burden (TMB), Neoantigen.