Toxicity and quality of life are undervalued

Before 2011 median survival in metastatic melanoma was under a year; this trial shows that roughly half of patients treated with combination checkpoint blockade are now long-term survivors, effectively cured. It anchors first-line treatment of advanced melanoma and sets the benchmark for every new regimen, including nivolumab-relatlimab. The combination's toxicity means nivolumab alone or newer doublets remain reasonable for some patients.

For patients with advanced melanoma, immunotherapy offers a realistic chance of long-term survival and probably cure, and the ten-year data show that patients who are alive and progression-free at three years rarely die of melanoma afterwards. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab gives the best long-term results but at a high price in serious side effects; nivolumab alone or nivolumab plus relatlimab are alternatives for patients at lower risk or with autoimmune concerns. The trial is also a caution about surrogate endpoints: the survival plateau took years to become visible.

Patients with high-risk bladder cancer confined to the lining whose disease has not responded to BCG now have a bladder-sparing option that clears the cancer in most cases, delivered through a simple outpatient procedure. It may allow many to avoid or defer cystectomy, a life-changing operation. Whether responses translate into avoided progression and cystectomy over the long term, and how it compares with cystectomy on survival, remain to be shown.

Almost every patient newly diagnosed with advanced bladder or urothelial cancer should now be offered enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab rather than chemotherapy, with median survival extended from about 16 months to over two and a half years. Neuropathy and skin toxicity need monitoring and dose adjustment, and patients with severe diabetes or pre-existing neuropathy need care. Platinum chemotherapy remains an option for those who cannot receive the combination.

IMerge validated telomerase as a drug target in cancer, decades after its discovery, and gave a second-line option for MDS patients whose anaemia no longer responds to erythropoietin or luspatercept. The hint of clonal reduction is what makes the drug interesting beyond transfusion counts. Cytopenias require close monitoring in the first cycles.

Patients newly diagnosed with EGFR-mutated advanced lung cancer now have a first-line option that improves survival over osimertinib, particularly if they have high-risk features. The trade-off is intravenous (now subcutaneous) infusions and considerably more skin, nail and clotting toxicity, so osimertinib alone remains reasonable for those who prioritise convenience and tolerability. Both this regimen and osimertinib plus chemotherapy (FLAURA2) are approved; there is no direct comparison.

Patients with melanoma that has spread to palpable lymph nodes should now be offered immunotherapy before rather than only after surgery: two cycles of low-dose ipilimumab with nivolumab, then surgery, with the pathology result deciding whether any more treatment is needed. Most patients respond well and are spared a year of adjuvant therapy. Serious side effects are more common than with nivolumab alone, mostly endocrine, and the approach requires close coordination between oncologists, surgeons and pathologists.

COMMANDS moved luspatercept from second line (after ESA failure, MEDALIST trial) to first line, offering transfusion-dependent lower-risk MDS patients a better chance of transfusion freedom from the start. It changed guidelines and labels in 2023. Erythropoietin remains a reasonable and cheaper option for patients without ring sideroblasts or with low transfusion burden.

Patients with small-cell lung cancer that has relapsed after chemotherapy now have a drug that works far better than topotecan or lurbinectedin, and it is the first T-cell engager approved for a solid tumour. Treatment requires inpatient monitoring for the first doses because of cytokine release syndrome, which most centres now manage on a short-stay basis. It does not yet apply to first-line treatment, where trials are ongoing.

Young adults with a grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma who have had surgery can now take a daily tablet that slows or reverses tumour growth and defers radiotherapy and chemotherapy, both of which carry long-term cognitive costs, by years. It confirms that the IDH mutation is a driver that can be targeted, not just a marker. Whether it improves survival or cognition over the long term, and whether it helps in higher-grade or previously treated tumours, is unknown.

Elranatamab confirmed that BCMA bispecifics are a class, not a one-off, and its protocol-built dose reduction after response set a precedent for lowering the immunosuppressive burden of T-cell engagers. Patients now have two approved BCMA bispecifics and one against GPRC5D (talquetamab). Choosing between them, and sequencing them with CAR-T, remains guided by availability and toxicity profile rather than head-to-head data.

MOMENTUM addressed the biggest gap left by ruxolitinib: patients whose anaemia makes standard JAK inhibition hard to give. Momelotinib is now the preferred option for anaemic, previously treated myelofibrosis and is being adopted in first line for anaemic patients. The absolute symptom benefit is modest and durable disease modification has not been shown.

Cercek's dostarlimab study is the clearest demonstration that immunotherapy can replace surgery in a solid tumour: patients with dMMR rectal cancer can keep their rectum and avoid the permanent effects of pelvic radiotherapy and surgery. Non-operative management after PD-1 blockade is now in guidelines for this group, and MMR testing before treatment of rectal cancer is essential. The approach applies only to the 5-10% of rectal cancers that are dMMR.

For HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after trastuzumab and a taxane, trastuzumab deruxtecan is now the standard second-line treatment and T-DM1 has moved later in the sequence. The benefit is large enough that ADC design, not just the target, is understood to be what matters. Patients need lung monitoring because of the risk of pneumonitis.

Patients whose breast cancer was previously called HER2-negative may now be eligible for an effective HER2-directed drug if their tumour has even low-level HER2 staining, so pathology reports must now distinguish HER2-low (1+ or 2+/ISH-negative) from HER2-zero. This applies to metastatic disease after at least one line of chemotherapy; it does not mean these patients benefit from trastuzumab or other older HER2 drugs.

Patients with rectal cancer whose tumour is mismatch-repair deficient (about 5-10% of rectal cancers) can now be offered immunotherapy alone with the realistic expectation of avoiding surgery, radiotherapy and a permanent stoma. This requires mismatch repair testing on the diagnostic biopsy, close endoscopic and MRI surveillance, and treatment in an experienced centre. It does not apply to the 90% of rectal cancers that are mismatch-repair proficient.

For stage II colon cancer, where most patients are cured by surgery alone, a blood test can identify the minority who benefit from chemotherapy and spare everyone else its side effects. It does not yet prove that treating ctDNA-positive patients improves survival compared with not treating them.

For stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer, chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab before surgery and pembrolizumab alone afterwards is now the standard approach worldwide, and the survival gain is real, not just a surrogate. It does not apply to stage I disease or to hormone-receptor-positive or HER2-positive cancers. The price is a year of immunotherapy with a meaningful chance of a permanent endocrine side effect such as hypothyroidism or adrenal insufficiency.

Teclistamab showed that an off-the-shelf bispecific can approach CAR-T-like response rates in late myeloma, giving patients who cannot wait for or access cell therapy a real option. It also exposed the price: prolonged T-cell engagement causes profound immunosuppression, so infection prophylaxis and immunoglobulin replacement are now routine. Less frequent dosing after response is being adopted to reduce this burden.

Patients with newly diagnosed advanced melanoma have a dual-checkpoint option that improves on nivolumab alone with only a modest increase in serious side effects, making it attractive for those unable to tolerate or unwilling to risk the toxicity of ipilimumab. It did not prove superior survival, and it has not been compared with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, which remains preferred for patients with brain metastases or other high-risk features. LAG-3 is now an established target under study in many other cancers.

TRANSFORM confirmed ZUMA-7's conclusion with a different CD19 CAR-T and a more permissive design that allowed bridging chemotherapy, making the results closer to real-world practice. Liso-cel's low toxicity makes it attractive for older or frailer patients and for outpatient delivery. Together the two trials made CAR-T the standard second-line therapy for early-relapsing aggressive lymphoma.

Sacituzumab govitecan is a standard second-line or later treatment for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, roughly doubling survival compared with the chemotherapies it was tested against. Patients should expect neutropenia and diarrhoea, which are manageable with growth factor support and loperamide. Trials are now testing it earlier, in first-line combinations with pembrolizumab and after surgery for residual disease.

Checkpoint inhibitors are now given to hundreds of thousands of patients a year, many in community clinics and emergency departments, so a common, explicit playbook for their autoimmune side effects saves lives. The guideline standardised when to stop, when to give steroids and when to escalate, and made multidisciplinary toxicity teams routine. It does not remove the judgement needed for rare events or for patients whose cancer is responding.

CARTITUDE-1 showed that a single CAR-T infusion can put late-stage myeloma into deep, multi-year remission, leading to FDA approval of cilta-cel in 2022 for heavily pretreated disease. It set the efficacy bar for BCMA-directed therapy and motivated moving CAR-T earlier (CARTITUDE-4). Late neurological toxicity and secondary malignancies remain the safety questions.

Patients with newly diagnosed advanced clear-cell kidney cancer should receive an immunotherapy-based combination; lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab gives the highest response rate and longest PFS of the available options, at the cost of more side effects requiring dose adjustment. Sunitinib alone is no longer an appropriate standard. Choosing among the combinations depends on risk group, symptoms, comorbidity and the value placed on treatment-free survival, which favours nivolumab plus ipilimumab in intermediate and poor risk.

The dose on the label is often not the best dose for patients; it is the highest one that was tolerable for a few weeks. Project Optimus means new cancer drugs should arrive with evidence on dose, and it gives clinicians licence to consider dose reduction for toxicity. For older drugs, the evidence gap persists.

Older patients are more likely to be harmed by standard-dose chemotherapy, and a structured assessment of function, cognition, nutrition and social support lets oncologists adjust treatment safely. Starting lower does not appear to shorten life. Most older patients still do not get such an assessment.

Patients whose kidney cancer has been removed but who are at high risk of recurrence (large or high-grade tumours, node involvement, or resected metastases) can now be offered a year of pembrolizumab, which increases the chance of being alive and cancer-free several years later. Roughly nine patients need treatment to prevent one recurrence at two years, and some will have permanent side effects, so shared decision-making matters. Why pembrolizumab succeeded where similar drugs failed is not fully understood.

For ALK-positive advanced lung cancer, lorlatinib as the first drug offers the possibility of many years without progression and strong protection against brain metastases. Alectinib and brigatinib remain alternatives with a gentler side-effect profile; the choice weighs lorlatinib's cognitive, metabolic and weight effects against its unmatched duration of control.

ELEVATE-TN put a more selective BTK inhibitor into first-line CLL and, with the head-to-head ELEVATE-RR trial, showed it is as effective as ibrutinib with fewer cardiac side effects. Continuous acalabrutinib became one of the two main front-line options alongside fixed-duration venetoclax combinations. The trade-off is indefinite therapy and cost versus a time-limited course.

Women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer that has spread to lymph nodes and has other high-risk features can now be offered two years of abemaciclib alongside their hormone therapy, with a durable reduction in relapse. It does not apply to node-negative or low-risk disease, and the diarrhoea and cost are real trade-offs to discuss.

ZUMA-2 gave patients with BTK-inhibitor-refractory mantle cell lymphoma, who previously had a median survival under a year, a therapy with durable remissions in a substantial fraction. Brexu-cel is now standard after BTK inhibitor failure and CAR-T is being tested earlier in the disease. Neurotoxicity rates are higher than in other lymphoma CAR-T trials.

ECHELON-1 made a targeted antibody-drug conjugate part of first-line Hodgkin therapy and eventually showed that this saves lives, not just relapses. It set the reference arm against which nivolumab-AVD (SWOG S1826) and BrECADD (HD21) were later compared. Neuropathy is the main price and needs proactive dose modification.

Routinely asking patients how they feel between visits, and acting on the answers, is a treatment in itself. It catches problems early, keeps people on effective therapy longer and appears to extend life. Cancer centres now build symptom monitoring into electronic records, though implementation is uneven.

ZUMA-1 showed that CAR-T can cure a meaningful fraction of adults whose aggressive lymphoma no longer responds to chemotherapy, a group with a historical median survival of about six months (SCHOLAR-1). Axi-cel became the first CAR-T approved for lymphoma and later the first to beat standard second-line therapy in ZUMA-7. The comparatively high neurotoxicity of CD28-costimulated products was also first characterised here.

INO-VATE made inotuzumab a standard salvage therapy for adult ALL and a common route to transplant, and, with the TOWER trial of blinatumomab, moved adult ALL from chemotherapy-only salvage to immunotherapy. Both drugs have since been pulled into front-line regimens. The liver toxicity signal shaped how transplant conditioning is chosen after inotuzumab.

For women at raised risk, a 5-year course of tamoxifen offers long-lasting protection against the commonest kind of breast cancer. Uptake is low because of side effects and fear of rare serious harms; low-dose tamoxifen (TAM-01) is now being tested to improve the balance. It has not been shown to save lives.

COMFORT-I turned the 2005 discovery of the JAK2 V617F mutation into the first effective medicine for myelofibrosis, transforming symptom control for a disease with no prior standard. Ruxolitinib is still the reference first-line therapy, with fedratinib, pacritinib and momelotinib as alternatives for cytopenic patients. It does not eliminate the malignant clone or reverse fibrosis in most patients.

This paper launched the immunotherapy era. It was the first randomised evidence that taking a brake off the immune system could extend life in a solid cancer, and it introduced clinicians to immune-related adverse events and to responses that arrive late or after apparent progression. Ipilimumab alone has since been superseded by PD-1 antibodies and combinations, but every checkpoint programme traces back to this result.

Palliative care is not what happens when treatment stops; it works best alongside cancer treatment from the start. Patients feel better, are less depressed and may live longer. Access remains the constraint: most of the world's patients never see a palliative care specialist.