OnCo
ideasIdea

Hospital-at-home for oncology: treating low-risk febrile neutropenia and dehydration at home

Many hospital stays for cancer patients, such as for fever after chemotherapy in low-risk cases, could be delivered at home with daily nurse visits and remote monitoring, which patients prefer and which is cheaper.

Hospital-at-home programmes deliver acute-level care (IV antibiotics, fluids, monitoring, daily nurse and physician oversight) in the patient's home and have shown equivalent or better outcomes, fewer complications, and lower costs in general medicine. Oncology-specific programmes (such as Huntsman at Home) report reduced admissions and emergency visits. Expanding the model to defined oncology conditions, with payer recognition, would reduce hospitalisation, which is particularly harmful for older patients.

Hypothesis
Oncology hospital-at-home will reduce inpatient bed-days for eligible conditions by at least 40% with no increase in 30-day mortality or escalation, and higher patient satisfaction.
Rationale
Hospital stays cause deconditioning, delirium, and infection in older patients; the interventions for many oncology admissions are deliverable at home.
What would test it
A randomised trial of hospital-at-home versus admission for low-risk febrile neutropenia, dehydration, and symptom crises in 500 patients with bed-days, safety, and satisfaction as endpoints.
Maturity
being tested at scale
Who has to act
clinic
Cost to try
Medium ($1M to $50M)
Years to first evidence
3
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

5top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links