OnCo
ideasIdea

Measure and publish pain control rates in every cancer centre

Hospitals publish survival and infection rates but almost never how many of their cancer patients are in uncontrolled pain. Measuring and publishing it would make pain a priority.

Undertreated cancer pain remains common even in well-resourced systems. Routine pain scoring exists in many hospitals but is not aggregated, benchmarked, or published. A national quality indicator (for instance, the proportion of patients with advanced cancer reporting moderate or severe pain at outpatient visits) with public reporting by centre would use the same accountability lever that improved infection control and waiting times.

Hypothesis
Centres subject to public pain-control reporting will reduce the proportion of patients with moderate or severe pain by at least a third within two years.
Rationale
Public reporting of simple, patient-relevant indicators changes institutional priorities; pain is measurable, common, and treatable.
What would test it
Pilot a national indicator with public reporting in one country and compare pain prevalence trends with a comparator without reporting.
Maturity
speculative
Who has to act
policy
Cost to try
Small (under $1M)
Years to first evidence
2
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

3top