OnCo
ideasIdea

A replication status badge on every cancer paper, visible in PubMed

When you look up a paper, you should immediately see whether anyone has tried to repeat it and whether they succeeded.

Replication status is scattered across follow-up papers, preprints and comments (PubPeer). A curated, structured layer linking each paper to registered replication attempts and their outcomes (replicated, partially, failed, not attempted), displayed alongside abstracts in PubMed and Europe PMC via existing annotation mechanisms, would make reproducibility visible at the point of reading and reward replicators with attribution.

Hypothesis
Papers with a displayed 'failed replication' status will see a decline in uncritical citation (citing as established fact) of at least a third within two years.
Rationale
Retracted papers continue to be cited because the status is not visible where readers look; the same fix applies to replication.
What would test it
Annotate 1,000 high-impact cancer papers; deploy the badge via Europe PMC annotations; analyse citation context before and after.
Maturity
speculative
Who has to act
data
Cost to try
Small (under $1M)
Years to first evidence
2
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

6top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links