OnCo
trialsTrialPositive

MSLT-II

Showed that removing all the remaining lymph nodes after a positive sentinel node does not help patients live longer, ending a routine operation.

Melanoma-specific survival at 3 years 86% in both arms; dissection improved regional control at the cost of lymphoedema in ~24% versus 6%. Practice changed worldwide to nodal surveillance, which in turn made adjuvant and neoadjuvant systemic therapy the main lever for stage III disease.

Setting
Sentinel-node-positive melanoma: immediate completion lymph node dissection vs ultrasound surveillance
Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
John Wayne Cancer Institute / NCI
Registry
Headline result
No melanoma-specific survival benefit; lymphoedema 24% vs 6%.
Reported
2017
Enrolled
1939
Replication
DeCOG-SLT (Germany) reached the same conclusion.

Outcomes

1top
In plain words
What these results mean for people, not percentages
1,939 people took part
Melanoma-specific survival at 3 yearsprimarysurvival endpoint
  • 86 vs 86 out of 100 alive at 3 years with Completion dissection compared with Observation; 0 more per 100.
  • No difference between the groups on this measure.
  • Overall survival counts deaths from any cause, so it is the most direct measure of whether a treatment helps people live longer.
  • These results apply to the people the trial enrolled: Sentinel-node-positive melanoma: immediate completion lymph node dissection vs ultrasound surveillance. People in a different situation may not see the same effect.

Numbers are from the trial as recorded here; see the source links in the table below. This is orientation, not medical advice: ask your team how closely the trial population matches you.

1,939 participants enrolled.

Melanoma-specific survival at 3 yearsprimary
Completion dissection86 of 100
Observation86 of 100
Source
EndpointArmnValueHR (95% CI)pSource
Melanoma-specific survival at 3 yearsprimaryCompletion dissection86%link
Observation86%
Replication
DeCOG-SLT (Germany) reached the same conclusion.

Connected

6top