OnCo
key papersKey paper

NordICC: inviting people to a screening colonoscopy reduced bowel cancer, but less than expected

The first randomised trial of colonoscopy screening found an 18% reduction in bowel cancer incidence after 10 years among those invited, with no significant reduction in bowel cancer deaths; only 42% of invitees actually had the procedure.

NordICC randomised 84,585 people aged 55-64 in Poland, Norway and Sweden to an invitation to a single screening colonoscopy or to usual care with no screening. The primary endpoints were colorectal cancer incidence and death at 10 years, analysed by intention to screen.

The 10-year risk of colorectal cancer was 0.98% in the invited group and 1.20% in usual care (risk ratio 0.82). Colorectal cancer death was 0.28% versus 0.31%, not significantly different. In the adjusted per-protocol analysis, assuming everyone invited had attended, incidence fell 31% and death 50%.

The trial prompted a wide debate about the real-world effect of colonoscopy programmes versus stool-test programmes.

Randomised controlled trialHas not changed practice yet84,585 participants
Authors
Bretthauer M, Løberg M, Wieszczy P, et al.
What it found
  • Colorectal cancer incidence at 10 years: 0.98% vs 1.20% (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.93) by intention to screen
  • Colorectal cancer death: 0.28% vs 0.31% (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.64-1.16)
  • Only 42% of those invited underwent colonoscopy
  • Adjusted per-protocol estimate: incidence RR 0.69, death RR 0.50 among those who attended
  • Number needed to invite to prevent one cancer over 10 years: 455
What it means

A colonoscopy probably does reduce bowel cancer risk for the person who has it, but a programme that offers colonoscopy achieves much less if most people decline. Programmes based on stool tests with high uptake may deliver as much population benefit at lower cost and risk.

Be careful
  • Low participation dilutes the intention-to-screen effect; the per-protocol estimate relies on modelling assumptions
  • Ten years is short for a mortality endpoint after polyp removal; a 15-year analysis is planned
  • Adenoma detection rates varied between endoscopists and some were below quality thresholds
  • Results apply to a one-off colonoscopy at 55-64, not to repeated colonoscopy programmes as practised in the US

Key papers

1top

Connected

10top