OnCo
ideasIdea

A global first-in-human network for academic cancer trials with single ethics review

Academic first-in-human trials recruit slowly because each hospital repeats ethics and regulatory review. A network of phase 1 units with one shared review would open trials in many countries at once.

Twenty to thirty academic phase 1 oncology units across Europe, North America and Asia agree common protocols templates, a single mutually-recognised ethics and scientific review, a shared safety committee and harmonised contracts, so an academic first-in-human trial approved by the network opens at all sites within weeks. The EU Clinical Trials Regulation and US single-IRB rules already allow much of this; the missing part is an organisation that operates it for academic sponsors. The network also concentrates rare molecular subtypes and rare cancers, where single-site academic trials never accrue.

Hypothesis
Academic first-in-human trials run through the network accrue at least three times faster than comparable single-institution academic trials and reach a recommended phase 2 dose within eighteen months in the majority of cases.
Rationale
Industry phase 1 trials open globally through CRO networks; academic ones do not, and rare-cancer academic trials routinely close for slow accrual. The EORTC and the Children's Oncology Group show that academic multinational early-phase trials work when infrastructure is shared.
What would test it
Run five academic first-in-human trials through a pilot network of ten units and compare activation time and accrual rate with matched single-centre trials.
Maturity
speculative
Who has to act
regulator
Cost to try
Medium ($1M to $50M)
Years to first evidence
4
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

11top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links