OnCo
trialsTrialMixed

PREOPANC-1 / PREOPANC-2

Dutch trials testing whether treating before surgery beats operating first. Chemoradiation first helped in the long run; FOLFIRINOX first did not clearly beat surgery-first with adjuvant chemotherapy.

PREOPANC-1: gemcitabine-based chemoradiation before surgery improved 5-year OS (20.5% vs 6.5%) despite a non-significant primary analysis. PREOPANC-2 (2023): neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX did not improve OS versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine-chemoradiation. Together with ALLIANCE A021806 and NORPACT-1, they leave the neoadjuvant question open for resectable disease while borderline-resectable disease is generally treated neoadjuvantly.

Setting
Resectable and borderline-resectable PDAC: neoadjuvant chemoradiation (PREOPANC-1) or neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (PREOPANC-2) vs upfront surgery
Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
Registry
Headline result
PREOPANC-1 5-year OS 20.5% vs 6.5%; PREOPANC-2 no OS benefit.
Reported
2022
Enrolled
246
Replication
Supported by PREOPANC-2 and ALLIANCE A021806 in favour of neoadjuvant therapy in (borderline) resectable disease.

Outcomes

1top
In plain words
What these results mean for people, not percentages
246 people took part
Overall survival (long-term)primarysurvival endpoint
  • 20.5 vs 6.5 out of 100 alive with Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 5-year OS compared with Upfront surgery, 5-year OS; 14 more per 100.
  • Roughly one extra person helped for every 7 treated. That is a rough figure taken from the two percentages, not a guarantee for any one person.
  • Put another way, the treated group had about 27 percent lower chance of the event at any given time (hazard ratio 0.73, likely range 0.56 to 0.96).
  • Overall survival counts deaths from any cause, so it is the most direct measure of whether a treatment helps people live longer.
  • These results apply to the people the trial enrolled: Resectable and borderline-resectable PDAC: neoadjuvant chemoradiation (PREOPANC-1) or neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (PREOPANC-2) vs upfront surgery. People in a different situation may not see the same effect.

Numbers are from the trial as recorded here; see the source links in the table below. This is orientation, not medical advice: ask your team how closely the trial population matches you.

246 participants enrolled.

Overall survival (long-term)primary
HR 0.73 (0.56–0.96) · p = 0.025
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 5-year OS20.5 of 100
n = 119
Upfront surgery, 5-year OS6.5 of 100
n = 127
Source
EndpointArmnValueHR (95% CI)pSource
Overall survival (long-term)primaryNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 5-year OS11920.5%0.73 (0.56–0.96)0.025link
Upfront surgery, 5-year OS1276.5%
Replication
Supported by PREOPANC-2 and ALLIANCE A021806 in favour of neoadjuvant therapy in (borderline) resectable disease.

Connected

3top