OnCo
trialsTrialMixed

EMERALD-1

The first trial to show that adding immunotherapy and an anti-VEGF drug to TACE delays progression in intermediate-stage liver cancer.

PFS 15.0 vs 8.2 months for TACE + durvalumab + bevacizumab vs TACE alone (HR 0.77); OS trended (HR 0.80) but was not statistically significant at follow-up. Published in The Lancet 2025.

Setting
Embolisation-eligible unresectable HCC: TACE + durvalumab ± bevacizumab vs TACE + placebo
Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Registry
Headline result
PFS HR 0.77; OS HR 0.80, not significant.
Reported
2024
Enrolled
616

Outcomes

2top
In plain words
What these results mean for people, not percentages
616 people took part
Progression-free survivalprimarysurrogate endpoint
  • Median 15 vs 8.2 months with TACE + durvalumab + bevacizumab compared with TACE + placebo; about 6.8 months longer for half the group.
  • A median is a midpoint: half the people did better than this and half did worse, so it is not a prediction for any one person.
  • Put another way, the treated group had about 23 percent lower chance of the event at any given time (hazard ratio 0.77, likely range 0.61 to 0.98).
  • This is a surrogate endpoint: it measures the cancer being controlled or absent on scans and tests, which often, but not always, translates into living longer.
Overall survivalsurvival endpoint
  • The treated group had about 20 percent lower chance of the event at any given time (hazard ratio 0.8).
  • The absolute difference, how many more people out of 100 were helped, is not reported here.
  • The likely range for the hazard ratio crosses 1, so the difference could be due to chance.
  • Overall survival counts deaths from any cause, so it is the most direct measure of whether a treatment helps people live longer.
Be careful
  • These results apply to the people the trial enrolled: Embolisation-eligible unresectable HCC: TACE + durvalumab ± bevacizumab vs TACE + placebo. People in a different situation may not see the same effect.

Numbers are from the trial as recorded here; see the source links in the table below. This is orientation, not medical advice: ask your team how closely the trial population matches you.

616 participants enrolled.

Progression-free survivalprimary
HR 0.77 (0.61–0.98)
TACE + durvalumab + bevacizumab
15 mo
TACE + placebo
8.2 mo
Overall survival
HR 0.8 (0.57–1.11)

Numbers not yet public.

EndpointArmnValueHR (95% CI)pSource
Progression-free survivalprimaryTACE + durvalumab + bevacizumab15 months0.77 (0.61–0.98)
TACE + placebo8.2 months
Overall survivalTACE + durvalumab + bevacizumab0.8 (0.57–1.11)
TACE + placebo

Connected

4top