OnCo
trialsTrialPositive

CLL13 / GAIA

In fit patients, one year of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (with or without ibrutinib) clearly beat the old chemotherapy standard.

Co-primary endpoints: uMRD at month 15 (GIV 92.2%, GV 86.5%, RV 57.0%, CIT 52.0%) and PFS (GIV and GV superior to CIT; RV not). 5-year PFS: GIV 81.3%, GV 69.8%, RV 57.4%, CIT 50.7%; 5-year OS 91-95% in all arms. NEJM 2023; 5-year update 2025-26. Showed that venetoclax needs obinutuzumab rather than rituximab, and that adding ibrutinib improves PFS at the cost of more toxicity.

Setting
Fit, previously untreated CLL without del(17p)/TP53: chemoimmunotherapy (FCR/BR) vs venetoclax-rituximab vs venetoclax-obinutuzumab vs venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib
Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
German CLL Study Group
Registry
Headline result
5-year PFS 81.3% (GIV), 69.8% (GV), 57.4% (RV), 50.7% (CIT).
Reported
2023
Enrolled
926
Replication
Consistent with CLL14 (unfit) and with AMPLIFY (acalabrutinib-venetoclax ± obinutuzumab), which also showed the triplet with obinutuzumab gives the highest PFS.

Outcomes

2top
In plain words
What these results mean for people, not percentages
926 people took part
Undetectable MRD at month 15 (blood)primarysurrogate endpoint
  • 92.2 vs 86.5 out of 100 had no detectable disease on sensitive tests with GIV compared with GV; 5.7 more per 100.
  • Roughly one extra person helped for every 18 treated. That is a rough figure taken from the two percentages, not a guarantee for any one person.
  • Other groups: RV 57 of 100; Chemoimmunotherapy 52 of 100.
Progression-free survival at 5 yearssurrogate endpoint
  • 81.3 vs 69.8 out of 100 alive without the cancer growing at 5 years with GIV compared with GV; 11.5 more per 100.
  • Roughly one extra person helped for every 9 treated. That is a rough figure taken from the two percentages, not a guarantee for any one person.
  • Other groups: RV 57.4 of 100; Chemoimmunotherapy 50.7 of 100.
Be careful
  • This is a surrogate endpoint: it measures the cancer being controlled or absent on scans and tests, which often, but not always, translates into living longer.
  • These results apply to the people the trial enrolled: Fit, previously untreated CLL without del(17p)/TP53: chemoimmunotherapy (FCR/BR) vs venetoclax-rituximab vs venetoclax-obinutuzumab vs venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib. People in a different situation may not see the same effect.
  • The trial selected people by a biomarker (17p); the result should not be assumed for people whose cancer does not have it.

Numbers are from the trial as recorded here; see the source links in the table below. This is orientation, not medical advice: ask your team how closely the trial population matches you.

926 participants enrolled.

Undetectable MRD at month 15 (blood)primary
GIV92.2 of 100
GV86.5 of 100
RV57 of 100
Chemoimmunotherapy52 of 100
Source
Progression-free survival at 5 years
GIV81.3 of 100
GV69.8 of 100
RV57.4 of 100
Chemoimmunotherapy50.7 of 100
EndpointArmnValueHR (95% CI)pSource
Undetectable MRD at month 15 (blood)primaryGIV92.2%link
GV86.5%
RV57%
Chemoimmunotherapy52%
Progression-free survival at 5 yearsGIV81.3%
GV69.8%
RV57.4%
Chemoimmunotherapy50.7%
Replication
Consistent with CLL14 (unfit) and with AMPLIFY (acalabrutinib-venetoclax ± obinutuzumab), which also showed the triplet with obinutuzumab gives the highest PFS.

Key papers

2top

Connected

14top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links