OnCo
trialsTrialPositive

AGILE

In IDH1-mutated AML, adding ivosidenib to azacitidine tripled survival, one of the largest effects ever seen in a randomised AML trial.

Event-free survival HR 0.33 (95% CI 0.16-0.69); median OS 24.0 vs 7.9 months (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.73); CR 47% vs 15%. Stopped early for benefit. NEJM 2022. Whether ivosidenib-azacitidine or venetoclax-azacitidine (which also works well in IDH-mutant AML) should be first line remains debated; triplets are being tested.

Setting
Newly diagnosed IDH1-mutated AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy: ivosidenib + azacitidine vs placebo + azacitidine
Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
Agios / Servier
Registry
Headline result
OS 24.0 vs 7.9 months; HR 0.44.
Reported
2022
Enrolled
146
Replication
Single-arm ivosidenib-azacitidine (AG120-C-009) and venetoclax-azacitidine IDH subgroup data align; no second randomised trial yet.

Outcomes

3top
In plain words
What these results mean for people, not percentages
146 people took part
Event-free survivalprimarysurrogate endpoint
  • The treated group had about 67 percent lower chance of the event at any given time (hazard ratio 0.33).
  • The absolute difference, how many more people out of 100 were helped, is not reported here.
  • This is a surrogate endpoint: it measures the cancer being controlled or absent on scans and tests, which often, but not always, translates into living longer.
Overall survival (median)survival endpoint
  • Median 24 vs 7.9 months with Ivosidenib + azacitidine compared with Placebo + azacitidine; about 16.1 months longer for half the group.
  • A median is a midpoint: half the people did better than this and half did worse, so it is not a prediction for any one person.
  • Put another way, the treated group had about 56 percent lower chance of the event at any given time (hazard ratio 0.44, likely range 0.27 to 0.73).
  • Overall survival counts deaths from any cause, so it is the most direct measure of whether a treatment helps people live longer.
Complete remissionsurrogate endpoint
  • 47 vs 15 out of 100 had no sign of cancer on scans or tests with Ivosidenib + azacitidine compared with Placebo + azacitidine; 32 more per 100.
  • Roughly one extra person helped for every 3 treated. That is a rough figure taken from the two percentages, not a guarantee for any one person.
  • This is a surrogate endpoint: it measures the cancer being controlled or absent on scans and tests, which often, but not always, translates into living longer.
Be careful
  • These results apply to the people the trial enrolled: Newly diagnosed IDH1-mutated AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy: ivosidenib + azacitidine vs placebo + azacitidine. People in a different situation may not see the same effect.
  • The trial selected people by a biomarker (IDH1); the result should not be assumed for people whose cancer does not have it.

Numbers are from the trial as recorded here; see the source links in the table below. This is orientation, not medical advice: ask your team how closely the trial population matches you.

146 participants enrolled.

Event-free survivalprimary
HR 0.33 (0.16–0.69) · p = 0.002

Numbers not yet public.

Source
Overall survival (median)
HR 0.44 (0.27–0.73)
Ivosidenib + azacitidine
24 mo
Placebo + azacitidine
7.9 mo
Complete remission
Ivosidenib + azacitidine47 of 100
Placebo + azacitidine15 of 100
EndpointArmnValueHR (95% CI)pSource
Event-free survivalprimaryIvosidenib + azacitidine720.33 (0.16–0.69)0.002link
Placebo + azacitidine74
Overall survival (median)Ivosidenib + azacitidine24 months0.44 (0.27–0.73)
Placebo + azacitidine7.9 months
Complete remissionIvosidenib + azacitidine47%
Placebo + azacitidine15%
Replication
Single-arm ivosidenib-azacitidine (AG120-C-009) and venetoclax-azacitidine IDH subgroup data align; no second randomised trial yet.

Key papers

1top

Connected

5top