OnCo
ideasIdea

One multiregional trial, no bridging studies: enforce ICH E17 in Japan and China

Japan and China have often required extra local studies before accepting a global trial. Committing to accept well-designed global trials would bring drugs to Asian patients years earlier.

ICH E17 (2017) describes how a multiregional clinical trial can support approval in all participating regions. In practice, sponsors still run bridging or local phase 1 studies for Japan and China, and China's requirement for local data has only partly relaxed. The proposal is a formal commitment by PMDA and NMPA, monitored through ICH, that MRCTs meeting E17 criteria (pre-specified regional enrolment, consistency assessment) remove the need for bridging studies, with a published list of exceptions.

Hypothesis
The 'drug lag' between US and Japanese or Chinese oncology approvals falls below six months for products developed under E17-compliant MRCTs, compared with a historical lag of two to four years.
Rationale
Ethnic sensitivity for most modern targeted and immune therapies is small and can be assessed within an MRCT; bridging studies delay access without changing decisions in most cases. PMDA's 2024 relaxation of the Japanese phase 1 requirement for many drugs shows movement is possible.
What would test it
Audit the last 50 oncology approvals in Japan and China for bridging requirements and approval lag; pilot E17 commitments for the next 20 oncology MRCTs with pre-specified regional enrolment.
Maturity
early clinical
Who has to act
regulator
Cost to try
Small (under $1M)
Years to first evidence
3
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

3top