OnCo
ideasIdea

Let MCED trials read out on late-stage incidence, with mortality follow-up mandated

Blood tests that look for many cancers at once take a decade to prove they save lives. Regulators could accept fewer late-stage cancers as the first answer, if trials keep counting deaths afterwards.

NHS-Galleri chose stage III/IV incidence as its primary endpoint; regulators have not said whether that suffices for approval or coverage. Propose a formal surrogate-validation exercise pooling individual data from completed screening RCTs (NLST, NELSON, UKCTOCS, ERSPC, Minnesota, NordICC) to estimate the trial-level correlation between late-stage incidence reduction and cancer-specific mortality reduction, and a conditional-approval pathway with mandated mortality follow-up.

Hypothesis
Across historical screening RCTs, the trial-level relative reduction in stage III/IV incidence predicts cancer-specific mortality reduction well enough (R-squared above 0.7) that a pre-specified late-stage incidence threshold can serve as a conditional endpoint.
Rationale
UKCTOCS is the cautionary case: it shifted stage without reducing mortality because the ovarian cancers that shifted were still lethal. A pooled analysis would quantify when stage shift does and does not translate, per cancer, instead of arguing by anecdote.
What would test it
Individual-patient-data meta-analysis of screening RCTs (two years, small budget); then FDA/MHRA guidance on conditional MCED approval; NHS-Galleri and the NCI Vanguard study as first users.
Maturity
speculative
Who has to act
regulator
Cost to try
Small (under $1M)
Years to first evidence
3
Bottlenecks it attacks

Key papers

2top

Connected

12top