OnCo
ideasIdea

Enforce individual participant data sharing as a condition of publication and funding

Journals and funders already ask trialists to share patient-level data; almost nobody checks. Make it a checked condition with real consequences.

ICMJE requires data-sharing statements, and funders such as the NIH require sharing plans, but audits find that a minority of oncology trials actually make individual participant data available. The proposal is a joint enforcement mechanism: deposit to an accredited repository (Vivli, YODA, Project Data Sphere) within 18 months of primary publication, verified by the journal before publication of any secondary paper, and by funders before any new award.

Hypothesis
Verified enforcement will raise actual availability of oncology trial participant data from under 20 percent to over 70 percent within five years, enabling pooled analyses and external validations that are currently impossible.
Rationale
Compliance with trial registration jumped only when ICMJE made it a condition of publication; sharing needs the same enforced condition rather than a statement.
What would test it
Two major oncology journals adopt verified deposit for one year; compare actual availability of data from their trials against matched journals without the rule.
Maturity
speculative
Who has to act
policy
Cost to try
Small (under $1M)
Years to first evidence
3
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

5top