OnCo
ideasIdea

Select cachexia trial patients by the hormone driving their wasting

Wasting has several causes. Measuring the specific hormone in each patient's blood would put the right patients into the right trial instead of mixing everyone together.

Cachexia trials have historically enrolled by weight loss criteria alone, mixing inflammatory, anorexic, hypermetabolic and mechanical causes. Plasma GDF-15, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein and resting energy expenditure define mechanistically distinct groups. Enriching for high GDF-15 in anti-GDF-15 trials, and for high interleukin-6 in anti-inflammatory trials, is straightforward and cheap.

Hypothesis
Biomarker-stratified enrolment increases the observed treatment effect size in cachexia trials by at least 50% relative to unselected enrolment, converting historically borderline results into clear ones.
Rationale
Mechanistic stratification rescued many oncology drugs that failed in unselected populations. Cachexia is arguably the least stratified field in oncology despite having measurable, causally relevant plasma markers.
What would test it
Retrospectively stratify banked samples from completed cachexia trials by GDF-15 and interleukin-6 and test for treatment-by-biomarker interaction; if present, mandate stratification prospectively.
Maturity
speculative
Who has to act
industry
Cost to try
Small (under $1M)
Years to first evidence
4
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

7top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links