OnCo
ideasIdea

Add the second drug on day one when the escape route is predictable

If most tumours escape a drug by the same back-up route, blocking that route from the start may prevent resistance rather than chase it.

For several targeted agents the dominant bypass is known in advance: MET amplification after EGFR inhibition, RTK and MAPK reactivation after KRAS G12C inhibition, and MEK reactivation after BRAF inhibition (which is why BRAF and MEK inhibitors are combined). Extending upfront combination logic requires tolerability, so intermittent scheduling or lower-dose partner agents should be part of the design.

Hypothesis
Upfront combination against the dominant predicted bypass extends progression-free survival by more than 50 percent relative to sequential addition at progression, at acceptable added toxicity.
Rationale
BRAF plus MEK inhibition proved the principle, converting a short-lived response into a durable one; the same logic has not been systematically applied to other classes because tolerability was assumed prohibitive without testing schedules.
What would test it
Randomised phase 2 of upfront versus at-progression addition of a bypass-directed agent in a setting with a well-documented dominant mechanism, with dose-optimised intermittent schedules.
Maturity
early clinical
Who has to act
industry
Cost to try
Medium ($1M to $50M)
Years to first evidence
5
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

12top