OnCo
ideasIdea

Make sponsors justify every trial exclusion of older and multimorbid patients

Most cancer patients are over 65 and many have other illnesses, yet trials routinely exclude them. Regulators should require sponsors to justify each exclusion, so the evidence matches the patients.

ASCO and Friends of Cancer Research published recommendations to broaden eligibility (organ function thresholds, prior malignancies, HIV, brain metastases) and the FDA issued guidance, but uptake in industry protocols is partial. A regulatory requirement that each eligibility exclusion be justified in the protocol, with default inclusion of patients with controlled comorbidities and no upper age limit, would shift the baseline. Enrolment of patients over 75 should be reported in labels.

Hypothesis
Protocols under a justification requirement will enrol at least twice the proportion of patients over 75 and with significant comorbidity, with no material change in trial timelines.
Rationale
Exclusions are copied between protocols by habit rather than evidence; making them costly to include changes the default.
What would test it
Compare age and comorbidity distributions in registration trials submitted before and after the requirement, and correlate with post-marketing safety signals.
Maturity
early clinical
Who has to act
regulator
Cost to try
Small (under $1M)
Years to first evidence
3
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

4top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links