OnCo
trialsTrialPositive

GHSG HD21

A new brentuximab-based intensive regimen matched Europe's most effective (and most toxic) chemotherapy with far fewer side effects.

BrECADD (brentuximab, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, dexamethasone) non-inferior and then superior for PFS: 4-year 94.3% vs 90.9% (Lancet 2024); 5-year 94% vs 91% (ASH 2025). Treatment-related morbidity 42% vs 59%; fertility markers preserved. 4-6 cycles guided by PET2.

Setting
Untreated advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma, age 18-60: PET-guided BrECADD vs escalated BEACOPP
Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
German Hodgkin Study Group
Registry
Headline result
4-year PFS 94.3% vs 90.9%, HR 0.66; less toxicity.
Reported
2024
Enrolled
1500

Outcomes

2top
In plain words
What these results mean for people, not percentages
1,500 people took part
Progression-free survival at 4 yearsprimarysurrogate endpoint
  • 94.3 vs 90.9 out of 100 alive without the cancer growing at 4 years with BrECADD compared with eBEACOPP; 3.4 more per 100.
  • Roughly one extra person helped for every 29 treated. That is a rough figure taken from the two percentages, not a guarantee for any one person.
  • Put another way, the treated group had about 34 percent lower chance of the event at any given time (hazard ratio 0.66, likely range 0.45 to 0.97).
  • This is a surrogate endpoint: it measures the cancer being controlled or absent on scans and tests, which often, but not always, translates into living longer.
Treatment-related morbidityother endpoint
  • 42 vs 59 out of 100 reached this endpoint with BrECADD compared with eBEACOPP; 17 fewer per 100.
  • On this measure the first group did worse, not better.
  • This endpoint is not one of the standard survival or response measures; read it alongside the trial's primary result.
Be careful
  • These results apply to the people the trial enrolled: Untreated advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma, age 18-60: PET-guided BrECADD vs escalated BEACOPP. People in a different situation may not see the same effect.

Numbers are from the trial as recorded here; see the source links in the table below. This is orientation, not medical advice: ask your team how closely the trial population matches you.

1,500 participants enrolled.

Progression-free survival at 4 yearsprimary
HR 0.66 (0.45–0.97)
BrECADD94.3 of 100
n = 742
eBEACOPP90.9 of 100
n = 740
Source
Treatment-related morbidity
BrECADD42 of 100
eBEACOPP59 of 100
EndpointArmnValueHR (95% CI)pSource
Progression-free survival at 4 yearsprimaryBrECADD74294.3%0.66 (0.45–0.97)link
eBEACOPP74090.9%
Treatment-related morbidityBrECADD42%
eBEACOPP59%

Key papers

2top

Connected

8top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links