OnCo

Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer

Read the page

10 slides generated from the cancer page, with a quiz from the open benchmark and speaker notes that cite the sources. Arrow keys move between slides; Print gives one slide per page.

Slide 1 of 10
  1. Teaching pack · Cancer · lung

    Small-cell lung cancer

    A fast-growing lung cancer that responds to chemotherapy then relapses quickly. After 30 years without progress, T-cell engagers and ADCs are finally moving the needle.

    Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice1 / 10
  2. What it is

    In two paragraphs

    Small-cell lung cancer is a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, almost always caused by smoking, defined by near-universal loss of TP53 and RB1 and by explosive growth. It presents as extensive-stage disease in two thirds of patients, responds to chemotherapy in most, and relapses in almost all. For three decades the treatment was platinum-etoposide, thoracic radiotherapy for limited-stage disease, prophylactic cranial irradiation, and topotecan at relapse.

    The field moved in three steps. First-line chemo-immunotherapy (IMpower133 2018, CASPIAN 2019, ASTRUM-005 2022) added two to five months of median survival and a small tail of long-term survivors. Consolidation durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage disease (ADRIATIC, approved December 2024) was the first curative-intent advance in 30 years, lifting median survival to nearly five years. In relapsed disease, tarlatamab, the DLL3 T-cell engager, became the first drug to beat chemotherapy on overall survival (DeLLphi-304; full FDA approval November 2025), and lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab became the first approved first-line maintenance regimen (IMforte, October 2025).

    Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice2 / 10
  3. Standard of care

    What is given today, by setting

    SettingApproachGuideline
    Limited stageChemoradiation → durvalumab; prophylactic cranial irradiation or MRI surveillance.not mapped
    Extensive stagePlatinum-etoposide + atezolizumab/durvalumab; lurbinectedin + atezolizumab maintenance.not mapped
    RelapsedTarlatamab (preferred), lurbinectedin, topotecan; I-DXd in trials.not mapped
    Screening and diagnosisLow-dose CT screening in heavy smokers finds some SCLC but stage shift is limited; diagnosis by bronchoscopic or CT-guided biopsy; staging with PET/CT and brain MRI.NCCN SCLC guideline, staging workup
    Very limited stage (T1-2 N0, ~5%)Lobectomy with mediastinal node dissection or SBRT, followed by adjuvant platinum-etoposide; PCI or MRI surveillance.NCCN 2A
    Limited stageConcurrent cisplatin-etoposide with thoracic radiotherapy (45 Gy twice daily or 60-70 Gy once daily), then durvalumab consolidation up to 2 years (ADRIATIC); PCI or MRI surveillance.NCCN 1 (durvalumab consolidation, category 1), ESMO-MCBS A
    Extensive stage, first lineCarboplatin-etoposide plus atezolizumab or durvalumab (4 cycles), then maintenance immunotherapy; lurbinectedin added to atezolizumab maintenance since 2025 (IMforte). Serplulimab-chemotherapy where approved. Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy for residual thoracic disease in good responders.NCCN 1 (chemo-IO); 2A (lurbinectedin maintenance), ESMO-MCBS 3
    Relapsed, platinum-sensitive (≥90 days)Tarlatamab (preferred, OS benefit); platinum-etoposide rechallenge; lurbinectedin; topotecan.NCCN 1 (tarlatamab), ESMO-MCBS 4
    Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice3 / 10
  4. State of the art

    Where the field stands

    • Tarlatamab: first OS improvement in relapsed SCLC in decades.
    • Immunotherapy consolidation in limited stage.
    • Limited-stage: chemoradiation followed by durvalumab consolidation (ADRIATIC), median OS approaching five years.
    • Extensive-stage first line: chemo-immunotherapy, now with lurbinectedin-atezolizumab maintenance (IMforte, 2025).
    • Relapse: tarlatamab (DLL3×CD3) improved OS over chemotherapy (DeLLphi-304) and received full approval in November 2025.
    • B7-H3 ADC ifinatamab deruxtecan and alpha-emitting SSTR radioligand RYZ101 are in phase 3.
    Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice4 / 10
  5. History

    How we got here

    1. 1973VA Lung Study Group defines limited vs extensive stage
    2. 1980Platinum-etoposide becomes standard
    3. 1985Platinum-etoposide becomes the standard regimen
    4. 1992Meta-analysis: thoracic radiotherapy improves survival in limited-stage disease
    5. 1996Topotecan approved for relapsed disease
    6. 1999Prophylactic cranial irradiation improves survival in complete responders
    7. 1999Twice-daily 45 Gy (Turrisi) sets the limited-stage radiotherapy standard
    8. 2017CONVERT: once-daily 66 Gy not superior to twice-daily 45 Gy
    9. 2017Japanese trial: PCI gives no survival benefit in extensive-stage disease with MRI surveillance
    10. 2018IMpower133: first immunotherapy OS benefit
    Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice5 / 10
  6. Pipeline

    What is coming

    • Ifinatamab deruxtecan (product)
    • Actinium-225 DOTATATE (product)
    • Tarlatamab (product)
    • DeLLphi-305 (trial)
    • IDeate-Lung02 (trial)
    • Serplulimab (product)
    • Lurbinectedin (product)
    • Subtype-directed therapy for SCLC (ASCL1 / NEUROD1 / POU2F3 / inflamed) (idea)
    • MRI surveillance replaces prophylactic cranial irradiation in SCLC (idea)
    • Prophylactic cranial irradiation vs MRI surveillance (technology)
    • Sequencing DLL3 engager and B7-H3 ADC in relapsed SCLC (pairing)
    • Chemo-immunotherapy induction → maintenance intensification (SCLC) (pairing)
    Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice6 / 10
  7. Evidence

    The trials that set the standard

    • CASPIAN (phase 3, n=805): Overall survival: 13 months vs 10.3 months, HR 0.73
    • ASTRUM-005 (phase 3, n=585): Overall survival: 15.4 months vs 10.9 months, HR 0.63
    • DeLLphi-304 (phase 3, n=509): Overall survival: 13.6 months vs 8.3 months, HR 0.6
    • IMpower133 (phase 3, n=403): Overall survival: 12.3 months vs 10.3 months, HR 0.7
    • ADRIATIC (phase 3, n=730): Overall survival: 55.9 months vs 33.4 months, HR 0.73
    • IMforte (phase 3, n=483): Overall survival: 13.2 months vs 10.6 months, HR 0.73
    Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice7 / 10
  8. Open problems

    What nobody has solved

    • Rapid chemoresistance.
    • Brain metastases.
    • No screening beyond CT for smokers.
    • Near-universal relapse after first-line therapy in extensive-stage disease; median survival still barely over a year.
    • No validated predictive biomarker for immunotherapy benefit; PD-L1 and TMB do not work in SCLC.
    • Sequencing of tarlatamab, I-DXd, lurbinectedin, and platinum rechallenge is untested.
    Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice8 / 10
  9. Quiz

    Check understanding

    1. What is the first T-cell engager to improve survival in a common solid tumour?
      Answer
      Tarlatamab (Imdelltra), DLL3×CD3, in second-line small-cell lung cancer: OS 13.6 vs 8.3 months in DeLLphi-304.
    2. What is the standard adjuvant treatment after resection of EGFR-mutant lung cancer and what did it do to survival?
      Answer
      Three years of osimertinib (ADAURA): DFS HR 0.20 in stage II-IIIA and OS HR 0.49, five-year OS 88% vs 78%.
    3. Why might an alpha-emitting PSMA drug work after lutetium PSMA has stopped working?
      Answer
      Alpha particles (actinium-225) deposit far more energy over 50-100 µm, causing clustered double-strand breaks independent of oxygen and cell cycle, so beta-resistant, hypoxic, or small-volume disease can still be killed; retrospective series show PSA responses in about half after 177Lu failure. Supply of Ac-225 and salivary toxicity are the limits.
    4. What was the first cancer drug approved on the basis of a blood test for leftover disease?
      Answer
      Atezolizumab for ctDNA-positive muscle-invasive bladder cancer after cystectomy (IMvigor011, using Signatera), approved Q2 2026; DFS HR 0.64, OS HR 0.59.
    5. What is the difference between a CT scan and a PET scan?
      Answer
      CT is a fast 3D X-ray showing size and shape; PET shows biology by tracking where a radioactive tracer accumulates (for example glucose uptake with FDG or a specific protein such as PSMA). PET/CT combines both.
    6. What is the difference between lutetium-177 and actinium-225 as therapeutic isotopes?
      Answer
      177Lu emits beta particles (range 1-10 mm, crossfire helps bulky heterogeneous tumours, marrow toxicity, 6.7-day half-life); 225Ac emits alpha particles (range 50-100 µm, very high energy, oxygen-independent clustered DNA damage, good for micrometastases, daughter redistribution and supply constraints).
    Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice9 / 10
  10. Sources

    Read the primary sources

    • NCI PDQ: small cell lung cancer treatment: https://www.cancer.gov/types/lung/hp/small-cell-lung-treatment-pdq
    • IASLC: tarlatamab first-line maintenance data: https://www.iaslc.org/iaslc-news/press-release/tarlatamab-anti-pd-l1-first-line-maintenance-after-chemo-immunotherapy-es
    • Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-cell_carcinoma
    • Guideline: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1462
    Teaching pack: Small-cell lung cancer · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice10 / 10