Teaching pack: Immunotherapy
6 slides generated from the front page, with a quiz from the open benchmark and speaker notes that cite the sources. Arrow keys move between slides; Print gives one slide per page.
Slide 1 of 6
- Teaching pack · Front
Immunotherapy
Immunotherapy helps the patient's own immune system recognise and destroy the cancer.
Teaching pack: Immunotherapy · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice1 / 6 - What it is
In two paragraphs
Checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, LAG-3), bispecific T-cell engagers, cancer vaccines (including personalised mRNA neoantigen vaccines), oncolytic viruses, cytokines, and innate-immune agonists. Determining who responds, and converting cold tumours to hot, are the central problems.
Teaching pack: Immunotherapy · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice2 / 6 - Technologies
The ways in on this front
- Antibody manufacturing (CHO bioprocessing): Antibody manufacturing means growing antibody drugs like pembrolizumab or trastuzumab in vats of engineered hamster cells, then purifying them. It is the industrial base for most modern cancer drugs.
- Bacteriophage-based tumour delivery: Using viruses that infect bacteria, not human cells, as programmable delivery shells for cancer drugs and vaccines.
- Bispecific antibodies: A bispecific antibody is one antibody with two different grabbing arms, so it can block two targets at once or pull an immune cell onto a cancer cell.
- Cancer interception vaccines: Vaccinating people who do not have cancer yet but are very likely to get it, against the antigens their future tumour will carry.
- CAR-T against stroma: fibroblasts and myeloid cells: Instead of attacking the cancer cell, engineering T cells to strip away the scaffolding and the suppressive immune cells that protect it.
- Chronotherapy: timing treatment to the body clock: Giving the same drug at a different time of day, because the body clock changes how much damage it does and how well the immune system responds.
- Cytokines & engineered cytokines: Cytokine therapy gives immune-signalling proteins as drugs. High-dose interleukin-2 was the first immunotherapy to cure some melanomas, at great toxicity.
- Dietary fibre and the gut microbiome for immunotherapy response: Patients who eat plenty of fibre and avoid probiotic pills seem to respond better to immunotherapy for melanoma, probably because fibre feeds the right gut bacteria. A proper trial is under way.
- Engineered bacteria as living cancer drugs: Bacteria that seek out the low-oxygen core of tumours, then manufacture a drug on the spot.
- Faecal microbiota transplantation for PD-1 non-responders: Transplanting gut bacteria from patients who responded to immunotherapy into those who did not. In small studies a minority of resistant melanomas started responding. Randomised trials are running.
Teaching pack: Immunotherapy · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice3 / 6 - Roadmap
History to horizon
- Immunotherapy roadmap: Coley's toxins → checkpoint inhibitors → engineered immunity · Prehistory (historic)
- Immunotherapy roadmap: Coley's toxins → checkpoint inhibitors → engineered immunity · Checkpoint revolution (historic)
- Immunotherapy roadmap: Coley's toxins → checkpoint inhibitors → engineered immunity · Earlier lines and combinations (current)
- Immunotherapy roadmap: Coley's toxins → checkpoint inhibitors → engineered immunity · Engineered immunity arrives (emerging)
- Immunotherapy roadmap: Coley's toxins → checkpoint inhibitors → engineered immunity · Speculative (speculative)
Teaching pack: Immunotherapy · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice4 / 6 - Evidence
The trials that moved the front
- KEYNOTE-006 (phase 3, n=834): Overall survival at 10 years: 34% vs 23.6%
- IMpower133 (phase 3, n=403): Overall survival: 12.3 months vs 10.3 months, HR 0.7
- ECOG-ACRIN E1910 (phase 3, n=488): Overall survival at 3 years (MRD-negative cohort): 85% vs 68%, HR 0.41
- IMCgp100-202 (phase 3, n=378): Overall survival: 21.7 months vs 16 months, HR 0.51
- TOWER (phase 3, n=405): Overall survival (median): 7.7 months vs 4 months, HR 0.71
- COG AALL1731 (phase 3, n=1,440): Disease-free survival at 3 years: 96% vs 87.9%, HR 0.39
Teaching pack: Immunotherapy · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice5 / 6 - Quiz
Check understanding
- What was the first personalised cancer vaccine to win a phase 3 trial?
Answer
Intismeran autogene (V940/mRNA-4157, Moderna/Merck) with pembrolizumab in resected stage IIB-IV melanoma: INTerpath-001 met recurrence-free and distant-metastasis-free survival, announced 19 August 2026. - How is a personalised mRNA cancer vaccine made?
Answer
The tumour and normal DNA are sequenced, software predicts up to 34 neoantigens unique to the tumour, a patient-specific mRNA encoding them is manufactured in lipid nanoparticles over about six weeks, and it is given with a PD-1 blocker. - What are the main side effects of checkpoint inhibitors and how are they handled?
Answer
Immune-related adverse events such as colitis, thyroid problems, rash, hepatitis, and pneumonitis, most common with CTLA-4 plus PD-1 combinations; treated with steroids and sometimes other immunosuppressants, some endocrine effects are permanent. - Name three next-generation ADC concepts beyond bispecific antibodies.
Answer
Dual-payload ADCs, degrader-antibody conjugates, immune-stimulating antibody conjugates, masked or conditionally active ADCs, peptide-drug conjugates, radio-ADCs. - Why might personalised vaccines work better after surgery than in metastatic disease?
Answer
Tumour burden is low so immune responses are not overwhelmed, there is time for the six-week manufacturing, immunosuppression from bulky disease is absent, and recurrence-free survival is a clean endpoint; INTerpath-001 tested exactly this adjuvant setting.
Teaching pack: Immunotherapy · OnCo, CC BY 4.0 · not medical advice6 / 6